A new wave of technologies and approaches has the potential to influence how monitoring, evaluation, research and learning (MERL) practitioners do their work. The growth in use of smartphones and the internet, digitization of existing data sets, and collection of digital data make data increasingly available for MERL activities. This changes how MERL is conducted and, in some cases, who conducts it.
We recently completed research on emerging technologies for use in MERL as part of a wider research project on The State of the Field of MERL Tech.
We hypothesized that emerging technology is revolutionizing the types of data that can be collected and accessed and the ways that it can be processed and used for better MERL. However, improved research on and documentation of how these technologies are being used is required so the sector can better understand where, when, why, how, and for which populations and which types of MERL these emerging technologies would be appropriate.
The team reviewed the state of the field and found there were three key new areas of data that MERL Tech practitioners should consider:
- New kinds of data sources, such as application data, sensor data, data from drones and biometrics. These types of data are providing more access to information and larger volumes of data than ever before.
- New types of systems for data storage. The most prominent of these was the distributed ledger technologies (also known as blockchain) and an increasing use of cloud and edge computing. We discuss the implications of these technologies for MERL.
- New ways of processing data, mainly from the field of machine learning, specifically supervised and unsupervised learning techniques that could help MERL practitioners manage large volumes of both quantitative and qualitative data.
These new technologies hold great promise for making MERL practices more precise, automated and timely. However, some challenges include:
- A need to clearly define problems so the choice of data, tool, or technique is appropriate
- Non-representative selection bias when sampling
- Reduced MERL practitioner or evaluator control
- Change management needs to adapt how organizations manage data
- Rapid platform changes and difficulty with assessing the costs
- A need for systems thinking which may involve stitching different technologies together
To address emerging challenges and make best use of the new data, tools, and approaches, we found a need for capacity strengthening for MERL practitioners, greater collaboration among social scientists and technologists, a need for increased documentation, and a need for the incorporation of more systems thinking among MERL practitioners.
Finally there remains a need for greater attention to justice, ethics and privacy in emerging technology.
The State of the Field Papers
This paper is one of a set of four papers that aim to take stock of the field from 2014-2019 as launchpad for shaping the future of MERL Tech.
- MERL Tech State of the Field: The Evolution of MERL Tech: Linda Raftree, independent consultant and MERL Tech Conference organizer.
- What We Know About Traditional MERL Tech: Insights from a Scoping Review: Zach Tilton, Michael Harnar, and Michele Behr, University of Western Michigan; Soham Banerji and Manon McGuigan, independent consultants; and Paul Perrin, Gretchen Bruening, John Gordley and Hannah Foster, University of Notre Dame; Linda Raftree, independent consultant and MERL Tech Conference organizer.
- Big Data to Data Science: Moving from “What” to “How” in the MERL Tech Space: Kecia Bertermann, Luminate; Alexandra Robinson, Threshold.World; Michael Bamberger, independent consultant; Grace Lyn Higdon, Institute of Development Studies; Linda Raftree, independent consultant and MERL Tech Conference organizer.
- Emerging Technologies and Approaches in Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Learning for International Development Programs: Kerry Bruce and Joris Vandelanotte, Clear Outcomes; and Valentine Gandhi, The Development CAFE and Social Impact.
Through these papers, we aim to describe the State of the Field up to 2019 and to offer a baseline point in time from which the wider MERL Tech community can take action to make the next phase of MERL Tech development effective, responsible, ethical, just, and equitable. We share these papers as conversation pieces and hope they will generate more discussion in the MERL Tech space about where to go from here.
By Kerry Bruce, Clear Outcomes and originally published as Emerging Technologies: How Can We Use Them for MERL?
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.